Effectively communicating clinical complexity in criminal forensic assessments and expert testimony represents one of the most consequential challenges facing forensic psychologists conducting criminal forensic assessments. Expert testimony must bridge two fundamentally different mentalities: the nuanced, probabilistic thinking of psychological science and the binary decision-making demands of legal proceedings. When complex evaluations involve trauma histories that complicate symptom presentation, dual diagnoses that obscure functional causation, or malingering concerns that require explaining the limits of detection, the translation challenge intensifies. Psychological findings must be reconceptualized to serve legal decision-making without distorting the underlying science.