Featured Article
Article Title
Inpatient dialectical behavior therapy combined with trauma-focused therapy for PTSD and borderline personality disorder symptoms: study design of the naturalistic trauma therapy study
Authors
Annemieke C. Kamstra - Research Department, GGZ Friesland, Leeuwarden, Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
Sybolt O. de Vries - Research Department, GGZ Friesland, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
Maarten F. Brilman - Department of Psychiatry, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
Petty Vasilev - Research Department, GGZ Friesland, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
Manna Alma - Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
Antoinette D. I. van Asselt - Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
Mia De Wolf - Research Department, GGZ Friesland, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
Robert A. Schoevers - Department of Psychiatry, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
Frederike Jörg - Department of Psychiatry, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
Abstract
Introduction: Childhood traumatization can result in physical and mental health problems in adulthood, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which negatively influences quality of life and social functioning. Although evidence based trauma treatments benefit clients with PTSD after childhood abuse and comorbid personality disorders, they are less effective than in clients who were traumatized in adulthood, and drop-out is substantial. The current study aims to assess the effects of inpatient dialectical behavior therapy combined with prolonged exposure (DBT-PTSD) on severity of PTSD, dissociation, parasuicidal behavior and borderline personality disorder (BPD) in clients with severe PTSD and comorbid psychiatric disorders. Secondary outcomes are social functioning, quality of life, borderline and cluster C personality disorder symptoms as treatment predictors, treatment trajectories, clients’ experiences and health economic consequences.
Methods: The naturalistic, longitudinal Trauma Therapy Study is conducted from January 2019 until May 2025 in a mental healthcare center in the Netherlands. Clients with severe PTSD and comorbid conditions who are referred to inpatient DBT-PTSD are included into the study. Based on power analyses a total sample size of N=56 is needed. Measurements take place before the waiting list period, at pre- and posttreatment and at six- and twelve-months follow-up. Clients fill in a daily DBT-PTSD diary, which gives insight into individual symptom trajectories.
Results: Statistical analyses include two-sided paired samples t-tests, linear mixed model analyses and cost-effectiveness analyses. Qualitative interviews are conducted within two years posttreatment and analyzed using a phenomenological approach. We correct for chance capitalization by using a conservative α-level of.01. Multiple imputation is used to handle missing data.
Discussion: Research on the effects of integrated treatment programs for clients with severe PTSD and co-morbid conditions is scarce. This study extends current knowledge on the effects of inpatient DBT-PTSD on PTSD and BPD symptoms, clients’ social functioning and quality of life. In addition, it provides insight into individual symptom trajectories and experiences, inspiring future treatment improvements for clients with severe psychopathology.
Keywords
Summary of Research
“With a qualitative semi-structured interview, we study clients’ experiences with DBT-PTSD… We use the DBT-PTSD diary to assess symptom trajectories and the individual differences herein between clients… During data collection and analysis, data files are only accessible for the research nurses during data collection. After terminating data collection, the researchers involved in the project can access the anonymized data file. The only exception are the qualitative interviews, which the interviewing researchers (PV and AK) can access during the study… Further, we will use linear mixed model analyses to study the effects of DBT-PTSD on social functioning and quality of life over time.” (p. 7- 8).
“We hypothesize that when PTSD symptoms decrease, improvements on the other variables will follow. To test this hypothesis, we will include PTSD symptoms as a time-varying covariate with a two week lag in our linear mixed models. Second, we study the degree to which clients invest in their treatment, operationalized by the DBT-PTSD diary items: ‘time spent on therapeutic assignments’ (in minutes) and ‘exposure assignments carried out’ (yes/no), as predictors of treatment outcome… We hypothesize that clients who are motivated and invest in their treatment, by doing more exposure assignments and spending more time on therapeutic assignments, will benefit more from DBTPTSD. To test this hypothesis, we will split the sample in half to compare clients with the highest and lowest scores on homework and exposure assignments during the first four weeks and over the whole course of treatment… A qualitative study will be conducted to better understand clients’ (short- and long-term) experiences with inpatient DBT-PTSD. We include clients in this part of the study, based on maximum variation sampling (age, gender, region of residence, treatment year) and expect to reach data saturation with approximately 15 participants…
…The study is carried out by researchers who were not involved in the design of the treatment program, which enhances the objective evaluation and generalizability of DBT-PTSD. Finally, the qualitative study may lead to important insights into client perspectives on treatment effects and helpful ingredients of DBT-PTSD." (p. 8- 10).
“In conclusion, the Trauma Therapy Study aims to extend the evidence base of inpatient DBT-PTSD for clients with severe PTSD and co-morbid psychiatric symptoms as a consequence of a traumatic history in a day-to-day healthcare setting. Beside extending nomothetic knowledge, (group level knowledge), idiographic knowledge is gained by including qualitative interviews and diary data. Perspectives of clients who participated in DBT-PTSD can inspire improvements to the treatment program” (p. 10).
Translating Research into Practice
In an RCT, outpatient Cognitive Processing Therapy and outpatient DBT-PTSD were both effective in reducing PTSD symptoms in women with a history of childhood abuse. DBT-PTSD led to greater remission and recovery rates and less drop-out compared to Cognitive Processing Therapy (respectively 25.5% vs. 39.0%). The inpatient variant of DBT-PTSD has a shorter, intensive treatment program. Compared to a waiting list group in which TAU was continued DBT-PTSD was effective in reducing PTSD symptoms. In an observational study DBT-PTSD outperformed an inpatient treatment that included trauma-focused treatment on PTSD, dissociation and disturbances in self-organization” (p. 9).
“Insight into individual symptom trajectories may inform clinicians to adjust future treatments more timely. Growing evidence of effective treatments for this client group and knowledge of prognostic factors, gives both clients and involved clinicians the opportunity to choose the most appropriate treatment through shared decision-making” (p. 10).
Other Interesting Tidbits for Researchers and Clinicians
To study the effects of DBT-PTSD on social functioning, we use the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS). The WSAS measures impaired functioning due to a disorder and contains five items/domains (work, home management, social leisure activities, private leisure activities and maintaining close relationships). Reliability and validity were demonstrated. We operationalize functional recovery with a score of ≤10 on the Work and Social Adjustment Scale” (p. 4- 5).
Additional Resources/Programs
As always, please join the discussion below if you have thoughts or comments to add!